点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
一位高铁列车长的62个闹钟******
新华全媒+｜一位高铁列车长的62个闹钟
视频：新华全媒+|一位高铁列车长的62个闹钟来源：新华社
“重点旅客到站。”1月9日17点45分，随着一阵闹铃声响起，列车长郎茜快速扫一眼手机提示，快步向8号车厢方向走去……
33岁的郎茜是中国铁路上海局集团有限公司南京客运段值乘D2281次列车的列车长。这趟复兴号列车由南京南站发至深圳北站，运行里程超1930公里，途经江苏、上海、浙江、福建、广东等5个省市。
9日是春运开启的第三天，D2281次列车运送旅客4780人次，大量乘客挎着大包小包踏上归乡旅途。“这是疫情防控政策进一步优化调整后的首次春运，旅客数量激增，也对我们做好服务提出了更高要求。”郎茜说，这是她经历的第13次春运。“进入春运后，我的闹钟设置明显变多了。”
临近傍晚，郎茜得知一对盲人夫妇将在漳州诏安到站，便提前设置闹钟重点关注。快到站时她将夫妇俩引导至车门处方便下车。“三年没回家过年了，感谢你们，终于到家了！”盲人旅客陈景山说。郎茜与安全员将陈景山夫妇小心搀扶下车，送到诏安站值班员手中，随后值班员将引导这对夫妇出站与家人会合。
这一幕是郎茜值乘服务的一个小缩影。2013年，郎茜走上列车长岗位。每逢工作当天凌晨4点30分，她就被第一个闹铃声唤醒，快速起床洗漱，随后开启一天的值乘工作。去年10月起她开始值乘D2281，新线路需要学习的地方多，她便尝试动态“闹钟法”帮助自己快速适应。
“手机闹铃成了我最好的‘小秘书’。”郎茜说，她手机里的闹钟在设置界面不停增增减减，零碎地记录下一天工作的众多细节，最多时一趟列车值乘下来设置过62个闹钟。“当时只想着千万不能忘了旅客的需求，后来一看手机才发现，闹钟设置了好几页。”郎茜说。
踏上列车，郎茜先巡查车厢。她从第一节开始认真检查，查看灭火器有效期，按下厕所冲水按钮看水压，查看卫生间是否消毒，听听广播音量是否合适……每一个细节都不能忽视，当所有车厢检查完毕，车站开始响起旅客放行广播。
“旅客安全出行是我们最大的责任，作为一名列车长，首先要把好安全关，做好现场作业和安全卡控，确保列车和旅客安全。”郎茜说。
“D2281的开行便利了许多往返长三角与珠三角的旅客。”郎茜说。6号车厢的乘客王磊是潮汕一家医美机构市场部的负责人，因为美容仪经销商在常州，王磊每月都要往返长三角与珠三角。由于美容仪较大，上车时郎茜就帮助王磊收起大件行李柜的隔板，同时协调其他乘客摆放好大件行李。
下午6点10分，郎茜的闹铃又响了。5分钟后，她便与另一位乘务员协助王磊把美容仪在潮汕站安全送下了车。车门缓缓关上，郎茜向王磊挥手致意，转身又投入到紧张的工作中。(新华社 记者刘兆权、何磊静、杨丁淼)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)